« sda megui profiles | Main | katamari hell »
July 10, 2006
the importance of labeling your tapes *properly*
with the rush of submissions after the long hiatus finally winding down (or winding up, as the case may well be), i thought i would take some time to hunt through the wall of vhs in my bedroom closet for two runs apparently located on unlabeled tapes: ajbolt89's 45:42 hard 10% in metroid zero mission and pirate109's pal 22% in metroid prime in order to recapture them correctly:
the high quality of aj's run was improperly cropped and not fixed when i captured it a second time for that exact reason, while the high quality version of one of p109's segments (the one containing geothermal core) was not run through smart bob, resulting in a bobbing d2 picture, not to mention the fact that the current capture has only mono audio and is missing a few thousand frames due to a bad signal written by a bad vcr. i hope to correct the latter two more minor errors with my new stereo pal vcr (compliments of banjonator) and my full frame time base corrector, respectively.
both of these primary errors (the cropping and the failure to run smart bob) are critical, and i feel as though i do not have a choice about recapturing these runs, especially when radix's luigi's mansion run and 19duke84's 0:50:25 run in silent hill 2 were just recaptured with the new dvd recorder method for no other reason than 'being rather dark'.
back to the monster in my closet: 'unlabeled' in this context means only that the tape lacks a side label. any other kind of label is more or less useless to me, especially if the tape in question is in a box - having to actually take a tape out of its box, much less extract it from the wall in the first place, is something i should not have to do in the interest of not spending hours in my closet looking for a particular run.
all this only adds to feelings i've had recently that no one really has any clue what it's like to be me. it's clear to me that i have problems no one else on earth has ever dreamed of: if a tower of vhs tapes falls on me and no one hears me yell out, does anyone feel sorry for me?
it's important to distinguish, though, between intentional and unintentional harm. i'm sure no one who sent vhs tapes to me without side labels had any idea what a catastrophe they were contributing to. i will not embarrass them here, but some of the most popular and successful speed runners on the site are in fact guilty of labeling their tapes either insufficiently or not at all. in the case of aj, this run (his most recent submission) seems to be the only exception to an otherwise stellar labeling record ...
i started by the door and worked my way back through the closet. finding aj's run halfway through the final column was a mixed blessing - i was disappointed to find it near the end of all the tapes, but i was elated to find it with a descriptive top label, which saved me from going through each and every one of these:
(aj's tape is on the ground between the two groups.)
many in the unlabeled group also lack top labels, meaning i would have to put each tape into the uber vcr one at a time to discover what it might hold. actually, i have been considering doing this anyway, side labeling them as i go, in order to forever banish any further hour-long treks through vhsia as occurred tonight.
i remembered that p109's 22% run had been sent in on tapes enclosed in huge plastic cases, so for his run i only had to extract every tape in a large plastic enclosure. there were far fewer of these than unlabeleds, and i separated them out while searching for aj's.
i am comforted by the progress dvd recorders have made in the community over the past few months, cutting out not only the meddling, inferior nature of vhs, but in many cases, the role of snail mail in delivering the runs to me, as well. if a run is submitted only in its purest digital form - .vob files - then the role of archiving the originals falls to me, and i of course am solely responsible for the labeling methodology in that case.
hey, maybe it'll all make a crazy story to tell the grandchildren.
Posted by njahnke at July 10, 2006 2:51 AM
Comments
Not to mention that SDA's submission page requires the tapes to be labeled on the front.
Posted by: MatrixTN at July 10, 2006 4:02 PM
Any particular reason why you don't throw away the tapes of runs that have been obsoleted?
Posted by: Maur at July 11, 2006 11:52 AM
well, if i threw away scarlet's 1:00 100% and archive crashed, that would be the end of any visual record of the route used in that run.
Posted by: nate at July 11, 2006 3:54 PM
quoth the raven: tapes of runs that have been obsoleted?
Scarlet's run does deserve historical protection. But not many other runs do. I was mainly going to tell you to just grab the IQ from somebody if archive crashed.
In 99% of cases, having an exact copy you can recapture if you wished really isn't important if there's a better run out there. And you might be able to reduce that tower of vhs tapes enough to keep you alive if it tips over. >_>
Posted by: Maur at July 12, 2006 2:22 PM
well when you say obsoleted i think runs that have been improved, and the 1:00 100% is an example of one. but if there's one run that should be saved from the dumpster, then there could be more than one, and therein lies the problem - it would assuredly take more time to sort them out than to just leave them be, and even if i did sort them out, reasoning it would save time in the future - could i ever have 100% accuracy deciding which to throw out and which to keep? people have even asked me to recapture tapes that never even made it up on the site for the purpose of watching what they did and improving upon it. so yeah, it's one of those situations where life sucks, and everything i might try to do about it will only make it worse.
Posted by: nate at July 13, 2006 12:38 AM
My initial reaction was to tell you to just stab the dilema in the heart and throw away scarlet's 1:00 100% tape. But really, unless Radix has his 1:37 on tape somewhere, I can't think of any runs anyone besides a few hardcore fanboys would want to protect.
nate, to be quite honest, I really don't consider not being able to recapture something a problem if a record of it already exists and if more than one person d/led it. I highly doubt you're going to go back through and recapture every single run on the site, so... I suppose you could separate out runs the public hasn't seen if you wanted to.
In essence, what I'm trying to say is that if you ever find yourself running out of space, there's lots of extraneous stuff in that closet.
Posted by: Maur at July 14, 2006 2:43 PM
What other runs would also fall under "historical protection"? The only two I can think of would be both aforementioned Metroid barrels (Scarlet's 100 in 1:00 and Radix's legendary 1:37).
Posted by: MatrixTN at July 14, 2006 3:33 PM
the problem is that i don't necessarily know which ones will be historically important tomorrow. if someone comes in and beats some run using a totally different route or a different character skin or something else someone might not prefer, and i've thrown out the original tape containing the old run, and the existing capture is in crap quality, then there's a problem - and it's my fault.
Posted by: nate at July 18, 2006 9:44 PM
I really wouldn't consider that a problem unless you decide to take the time to go through and recapture every single run later on. Which you won't.
Posted by: Maur at July 26, 2006 5:37 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)